• Don’t read to remember

    Ok, so the title is a bit clickbaity. If you are appearing for an exam you of course need to remember what you read. But not everything that you read needs to be remembered.

    Mo talking about how he reads and then forgets.

    I read to forget. Even when studying or working on papers for a PhD, I approach texts with the same mindset: I’m not a storage device that needs to save all bits of information. I am more of a system of Bayesian beliefs, constantly evolving and updating in small, incremental steps.

    […]

    From most texts, I only want two things: First, I want it to subtly alter my thinking, an incremental update that moves me towards a refined world model. Second, I want to pull out a few key pieces of information that I might use later in my writing.

    This comment on Hacker News succinctly describes what Mo is talking about.

    I cannot remember the books I’ve read any more than the meals I have eaten; even so, they have made me.

    Filed under
  • Gall’s law

    From Systemantics: How Systems Really Work and How They Fail by John Gall

    A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work. You have to start over with a working simple system.

    If you think about it, this is also applicable for evolution. Nature never creates new species. It evolves the existing ones. Single cell organisms to multi cell organisms. Leopard to snow leopard. Apes to humans.

    Filed under
  • On the shoulders of those before us

    This Hacker News comment by Spooky23 on the news that immunotherapy drug eliminated aggressive cancers in clinical trial.

    I’m both sad and incredibly happy to read this. I lost my wife recently to a recurring metastatic melanoma. She was treated at MSK by an amazing team.

    It was a terrifying diagnosis and literally would have been a guaranteed death sentence in 2017. In 2023, she had a very real chance of pulling through due to immunotherapy. Unfortunately some complications led to the worst outcome and we lost an amazing woman.

    I remember that my wife said once that the everything she had on that journey was on the shoulders of those before. So maybe in some small way she helped with the research and a future mother, sister, wife, husband, son, dad will have hope where there was none.

    Profound.

    Filed under
  • Skills

    Josh Swords talking about the four key skills that you need to focus on as you become a senior.

    The biggest gains come from combining disciplines. There are four that show up everywhere: technical skill, product thinking, project execution, and people skills. And the more senior you get, the more you’re expected to contribute to each.

    Technical skill is your chosen craft. Product thinking is knowing what’s worth doing. Project execution is making sure it happens. People skills are how you work with and influence others.

    Every successful effort needs all four.

    Filed under
  • Nine years as shareholder of Asian Paints

    I am only one year shy of completing ten years with my investment in Asian Paints. But don’t let the number of years fool you into thinking that I am a long term investor. More than half of my investment has come in FY 2023-24 (Figure 1). During the initial years—when the company was going strong and I should have been investing aggressively in it—I was looking the other way and trying to diversify. It was only when effect of Grasim’s entry into paint industry started becoming evident and the Asian Paints’ share price corrected, I made aggressive investments.

    Figure 1
    (more…)
    Filed under
  • Connection vs engagement

    This post from Sustainable Views reflecting on the commenting culture.

    Broadly speaking, the online platforms we use are not built for connection; they are built for engagement. This is universally true for all internet spaces, from stories to newsfeeds, for the intellectual and the plebian alike. And in the relentless optimization of user engagement, our social engagement is captured and rerouted from its original purpose. Instead of making friends, we are all performing for one collective internet stranger—a being that is sometimes brilliant, sometimes cruel, but always waiting to be impressed.

    It somehow feels like interactions that might have grown a friendship have instead ended up growing ad impressions. This is not strictly true, but I can’t shake the feeling that it isn’t wrong either.

    Filed under
  • Talk

    Some times I find tiny gems on Hacker News. Today was one of those days. This comment by a user going by the name lordnacho.

    It’s the internet. When you talk to people online, it often descends into pettiness. When you talk to people in the real world, that rarely happens. But it’s much easier to talk online, so people get the wrong impression.

    You should talk to strangers. It’s never gone wrong for me. Most people have a warmth and agreeableness that comes out when you are there with them, talking about stuff. There’s also the interesting effect that people will give you their innermost secrets, knowing you won’t tell anyone (I actually met a serial killer who did this, heh). For instance I was on a long haul flight earlier this year, and my neighbour told me everything about her divorce. Like a kind of therapy.

    I also find when I have a real disagreement with someone, it’s a lot easier when you’re face-to-face. For instance, I have friends who are religious, in a real way, ie they actually think there’s a god who created the earth and wants us to live a certain way. Being there in person keeps me from ridiculing them like I might on an internet forum, but it also keeps them from condemning me to hell.

    So folks, practice talking to people. Much of what’s wrong in the current world is actually loneliness, having no outlet for your expressions.

    Filed under
  • AI has softened the consequences of procrastination

    Ashanty Rosario talking about the challenges AI presents for education.

    Many homework assignments are due by 11:59 p.m., to be submitted online via Google Classroom. We used to share memes about pounding away at the keyboard at 11:57, anxiously rushing to complete our work on time. These moments were not fun, exactly, but they did draw students together in a shared academic experience. Many of us were propelled by a kind of frantic productivity as we approached midnight, putting the finishing touches on our ideas and work. Now the deadline has been sapped of all meaning. AI has softened the consequences of procrastination and led many students to avoid doing any work at all. As a result, these programs have destroyed much of what tied us together as students. There is little intensity anymore. Relatively few students seem to feel that the work is urgent or that they need to sharpen their own mind. We are struggling to receive the lessons of discipline that used to come from having to complete complicated work on a tight deadline, because chatbots promise to complete our tasks in seconds.

    Filed under
  • Investment strategy

    M. Pattabiraman dropping truth bombs while sharing his investment strategy.

    I recommend index funds to others so that they avoid repeating my mistakes. And that is what my portfolio is – a sum of all my mistakes made over the years. As I look back, I cannot think of a single intelligent, well-analysed choice.

    […]

    My portfolio was never well-designed or well-diversified. It was and is cluttered. I have learnt to live with it and realised the importance of inaction once your basics are in place during the accumulation phase.

    Instead of worrying about performance and returns, I focused all my energies on how much I can invest and how much I can increase this investment month by month. That has been the key driver of portfolio growth.

    A sum of all my mistakes made over the years—this statement hits the nail right on the head.

    Filed under
  • Perpetual anxiety

    Noah Smith sharing his thoughts on the recent report about plunging job market among college graduates. He starts off with this.

    The debate over whether AI is taking people’s jobs may or may not last forever. If AI takes a lot of people’s jobs, the debate will end because one side will have clearly won. But if AI doesn’t take a lot of people’s jobs, then the debate will never be resolved, because there will be a bunch of people who will still go around saying that it’s about totake everyone’s job. Sometimes those people will find some subset of workers whose employment prospects are looking weaker than others, and claim that this is the beginning of the great AI job destruction wave. And who will be able to prove them wrong? 

    In other words, the good scenario for the labor market is that we continue to exist in a perpetual state of anxiety about whether or not we’re all about to be made obsolete by the next generation of robots and chatbots.

    Ha!

    If the good scenario is us being in perpetual anxiety, then I don’t want to imagine the bad scenario.

    Filed under